Tag: N scale

  • 5 Reasons to Build a Small Layout

    After passing Pierpont Lake, the duo race a summer thunderstorm back to town.

    The first rule of model railroading is have fun.  This is a hobby, after all, and so it makes no sense to turn something fun into difficult work.  With that in mind, the second rule of model railroading is that it’s your railroad and you can do whatever you want with it.  I suppose if we added a third rule it would be to treat others with respect (looking at you, Modeler’s Life), but beyond that there really isn’t too much in the way of rules to follow.

    Naturally, a lot of people in the hobby have a dream of building a gigantic model train layout in their basement, a loft in their garage, or even a separate building.  Many such layouts have been featured in printed and digital media and I can understand the appeal.  Large layouts are a sign of discipline, education, and the accumulation of many years of knowledge about railroads, model trains, and a dozen other skill sets.  However, most of us likely aren’t going to have the chance to build something that big and those who do get the chance might want to consider a few things before breaking out the wood saw.

    The case for a modest train layout

    The fact is most train layouts aren’t particularly large.  The 4’x8’ layout in O scale or HO scale was the standard for decades, and while preferences have changed for how layouts are designed, the amount of space available really hasn’t.  The average train layout today can comfortably fit in a spare room and that’s likely all the room most people have to spare for their hobby.  A number of people have even less space, perhaps only one or two walls of one room that is used for other things, or maybe even a closet!

    Some things we can’t change and space is one of them.  Odds are that even if you move to a new house you and the family aren’t going to place high priority on finding as much space as possible for a train layout.  I mean, you might, but that would be an exception rather than the rule.  With that in mind, modest train layouts have plenty of benefits!

    1. Cost savings

    Train layouts that are on the small side are much more affordable than the basement empires we see in magazines or on Youtube. The fact is most people don’t have a lot of extra money these days to dedicate to leisure activities and at the same time model railroad equipment has gotten more expensive.  By focusing on a smaller layout, overall costs of construction can be brought down in terms of raw materials and equipment.

    2. Efficient Design

    A smaller area to build a train layout requires an efficient track plan in order to maximize the utility of the space. Larger layouts have a tendency to turn into a “spaghetti bowl” or they end up having more track than necessary in order to fill out the space. This doesn’t happen all the time, but it is a noticeable trend that shows up in a lot of the more classic designs. Now, that doesn’t mean you can’t build a model railroad that way, but most people who are low on space are going to think long and hard about what they want to include on their layout. As a result, there is usually a minimum of track and turnouts, key industries that don’t waste space, and other layout design elements that do their job well without wasting materials.

    3. Quicker Construction

    There’s only so much time in the week to dedicate to building a model railroad.  Between work, family, volunteer projects, and all the other things which occupy life, most people only find a few hours a week to enjoy a hobby.  With that being the case, wouldn’t it be great to get a train layout up an operating quickly?  Small train layouts are faster to build as a side effect of having less material to deal with.  Laying fifty feet of track is quicker than laying two hundred feet or more! Building a dozen model kits is faster than building three or four dozen. Wiring two locomotives for DCC takes an afternoon.  Wiring two dozen locomotives takes weeks to complete.

    4. More Details

    Model builders hold detail in high regard.  In fact, behind the smoothness of rollingstock and locomotives, a model’s details are what model railroaders focus on when purchasing a new piece of equipment.  If you only need to buy or kit bash a few items then you can invest more money into those items.  Additionally, fewer square feet to add scenery means it is easier to add a higher level of detail to a train layout.

    5. Comfortable Environment

    This last one is often overlooked by magazines.  Having a train layout is great, but if there is no place to sit and relax then people aren’t going to want to spend much time in the layout space.  Model railroaders in the modern day are also often renters or are purchasing a home with fewer bedrooms.  In such cases it is often unrealistic to expect a train layout to take up a large amount of real estate.  Instead, a small train layout can open up enough space for couches, TV’s, spare chairs, a kitchenette or coffee maker, and all the other creature comforts that make the hobby more enjoyable.

    Modest Layout Examples

    Of course, the first rule in the hobby is, again, its your railroad and you can build it how you want. We’ve all taken this to heart by building layouts that meet our needs without taking up so much space that it intrudes on the rest of the household or spills into our day jobs. That, I think, is a key thing to keep in mind about hobbies. They are meant to be enjoyed, but in order to enjoy them to their maximum potential we also must be able to take a break and not have to think about our modeling projects for short periods of time. Just like everything else, model trains are best done in moderation That’s why a layout is generally not placed in the living room but is instead out in the garage, down in the basement, or even in a dedicated structure.

    Anyway, in order to show what can be done in a modest space, I have a dedicated gallery of sample images from three train layouts. My own Black Hills and Fort Pierre, Jordan Schmieg’s Milwaukee Road Minnesota-Dakota Division, and Mike Thoreson’s TC&W Lakeville Sub. Each image has an included caption with information about what you are viewing so I encourage you to take a stroll through these digital galleries:

    Mike Thoreson’s Lakeville Sub

    Mike is a busy guy. Between work, raising a family, and being the president of the Black Hills Railway Society, there isn’t much room in the schedule for model trains. However, he did find space in the back of his basement to build a small train layout that satisfies his needs, provides storage for his model trains, and a workbench from which he produces some fantastic models! The Lakeville Sub models a small section of Minnesota in the late 1990s and features equipment painted in BNSF and Twin Cities and Western (TCW). The layout is a walk-in shelf design which features a large operating pit and shelves around 3 walls plus a peninsula. It does not have continuous running, but for a one or two man operating crew that is hardly an issue.

    Jordan Schmieg’s Milwaukee Road Layout

    Jordan Schmieg also lives a busy life and his is just getting started! Graduating from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology this spring, Jordan is looking forward to applying his degree in useful ways as well as finishing his home layout that depicts the Milwaukee Road transcontinental line in the 1970s. Like most model railroaders, Jordan prefers to model in HO scale since it gives him the opportunity to use prototypical equipment for his area and era. In this case, Jordan has a pair of SDL39s plus GP40s and SD40s. He also has some modern BNSF and steam locomotives on his roster as well. Jordan’s main operational interest is whole-train movements which presented him with a challenge in a 14×16 foot space. His solution was a double-track mainline that runs from staging at the back of the layout through the town of Andover, South Dakota where the layout is located. He also found room to model portions of a branch line that ran North to Britton, South Dakota. If you also prefer mainline train action but don’t have a lot of space, Jordan’s layout is proof that you can make it work!

    The Black Hills and Fort Pierre in HOn3

    My own home layout takes yet another approach to building a model train layout in a small space. Unlike the other examples in this article I rent my house which excludes me from knocking down walls, painting, or making any hefty modifications. Due to the nature of the lease and the low cost of my rent I would rather not make my landlords angry by leaving them with a tremendous mess to clean up. Frankly, a lot of people find themselves in a similar position. The solution that I found was to design and build a sectional, free-standing layout in the middle of the room with its own integrated backdrop, lighting, and valence. After building four sets of shelves out of 2x4s and press-board, I went about constructing three boxes that work out to being 24 inches deep, 96 inches long, and 28 inches high. These three were then fed into the layout room through a basement window and bolted together. Building the benchwork saved me a massive headache in that I didn’t have to clean up sawdust in a carpeted basement. I am now at the stage where I am laying track and painting backdrops under temporary shop lights. Progress is slow but steady and as of right now I have the track 90% done on one section of the layout and half the backdrops painted!

  • N Scale vs HO Scale: Which is right for you?

    The two most popular model railroading scales in North America are HO (1:87) and N (1:160).  HO scale still dominates the market but in recent years N scale has been growing substantially in popularity.  If you are new to the hobby then it is likely that you are trying to decide which one of these scales to invest in. This article will provide a brief description of both scales as well as key questions to ask yourself in deciding between N and HO scales.

    HO Scale vs N Scale

     Sized at 1:87th and with a standard gauge of 16.5mm, HO is the most popular model railroad scale on the market today. Almost every locomotive and car that rode the rails from the 1890s to present day can be found in this scale which makes finding and purchasing models that match your prototype straightforward. Many modelers find 1:87 to be in the “goldilocks zone” for modeling short lines and branch lines in a modest space. However, one disadvantage to HO scale is that for a lot of modelers the scale is too large to realistically model mainline running on Class I or Class II railroads. Because of this, there has long been a desire by model railroaders to fit a longer mainline run into a given space and this is where N scale really shines.

    Sized at 1:160th scale, N scale is roughly half the size of HO scale.  Structures take up one fourth the area and layouts can be built in very small spaces.  Alternatively, N scale can be used to model a much larger section of a railroad than HO scale if the space remains the same. This makes running mainline class I trains much more accessible. A big gap between the two scales used to be in the detailing possible.  HO scale had a reasonable level of detailing on equipment yet N scale was traditionally too small to achieve the same amount of detail. This gap has narrowed significantly in recent years and now N scale detailing rivals that of HO scale.

    N scale modelers were slower to adopt DCC due to the size of the electronics needed to be fit inside locomotives, but today that is no longer an issue.  One area that is still troublesome is in the lack of coupler standardization.  Truck-mounted couplers are quite common still on rolling stock even though such designs are almost extinct in HO scale.  Additionally, most manufacturers have their own N scale coupler which may or may not be compatible with other brands.

    Deciding on a Scale

    It is wise to pick a scale to model prior to purchasing a large amount of equipment.  If you already have a strong preference for one or the other, then roll with it.  But if not and you are stuck deciding between N scale and HO scale, considering the five following questions:

    1. What is my prototype? If you like running long trains on a mainline then N scale’s smaller size has several advantages.  However, if you like to run trains at slow speed and switch out industries, then HO scale tends to run smoother, slower, and more realistically.
    2. How much space do I have? Equally important is the amount of space available.  Do you have one or two walls to build a switching layout or can you use the whole bedroom?  How about the whole basement?  The garage? If you have the space to model what you want in HO scale, then it will be more convenient to do so.  However, if you have some space constraints then N scale will adapt better to tight spaces.
    3. Are the models I want available? This is also an important one. The good news is that just about every 2nd or 3rd generation mainline diesel locomotive that runs on US rails can be found in both N scale and HO scale.  The bad news is that N scale model availability isn’t as good as HO scale for unique models.  Check out what’s available to model your prototype before making a decision.
    4. Can I see and work on the models? Everybody is different when it comes to eyesight and dexterity.  Someone with nimble fingers and keen eyes will likely do just fine in keeping their N scale fleet running well.  However, not everyone has perfect vision and with age comes a tendency for eyesight and hand-eye coordination to deteriorate.  If you want to be modeling in the same scale 30 years from now, would be wise to invest in a larger scale now.
    5. What is my budget for building materials? The amount of benchwork, foam, scenery supplies, light fixtures, and more that are required to build a model railroad is determined by the type of layout being constructed and the scale being selected. Smaller scales will use less materials overall, so if you are on a budget it might be wise to build the layout that you are envisioning but in a smaller scale.

    Conclusions

    Remember that these questions are what I consider to be important.  While I hope you will also take these points into account when deciding on which scale to use, it is ultimately personal preference.  One of the site’s contributors, Jordan Schmieg, has built a fantastic layout of the Milwaukee Road in his area.  I personally still feel that N scale would have given him certain advantages to replicating the town of Andover and mainline operations, but Jordan wanted to stick with his HO scale because that’s what he had and the availability of unique models to the Milwaukee Road just isn’t there in N scale.  So he built himself a model railroad that he is happy with and that’s the important thing.